Destroit

Naw, just means I'm easy to entertain is all . I will say that I still don't get lonely, but I do enjoy company more than I used to now that I've gotten used to having you around all the time. Notice I said "enjoy" not "put up with", 'cause most anyone else I've dated...I put up with 'em .

From an accredated site (http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/relativity.html): "Notice that this equation tells you that for any particle with a non-zero mass, the momentum gets larger and larger as the speed gets closer to the speed of light (Cher's cliffnote: MOMENTUM...NOT mass). Such a particle would have infinite momentum if it could reach the speed of light. Since it would take an infinite amount of force (or a finite force acting over an infinite amount of time) to accelerate a particle to infinite momentum, we are forced to conclude that a massive particle always travels at speeds less than the speed of light." Furthermore: "Another interesting fact about the expression that relates E and p above (E2 = m2c4 + p2c2), is that it is also true for the case where a particle has no mass (m=0). In this case, the particle always travels at a speed c, the speed of light. You can regard this equation as a definition of momentum for such a mass-less particle. Photons have kinetic energy and momentum, but no mass!" To put this in terms that aren't so complicated, it clearly states that anything that doesn't have mass is constantly traveling at the speed of light, MEANING in order for something to be traveling that fast it has to have a decrease in mass, NOT increase. Obviously, light particles (photons) have no mass, meaning that mass must decrease in order to increase energy and become light.

Anyone who's gone to an accredated university knows that anything on a .com, .net, or .org website is totally uncredited and most likely false. If you were to even write a paper in college based off of anything from a .com, .net, or .org your paper would actually be given an automatic E. That's how inaccurate non-accredated sites are, so a tid bit of information from www.astronomynotes.com means nothing to me. Find me a better more accurate site and I'll take what you posted into consideration.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10036245-76.html Here's an a little tid bit from the last part of the article: Scientists once believed black holes' inescapable gravitational forces meant they'd grow inexorably, but renowned physicist Stephen Hawking later countered with the view that energy can in fact leak away from black holes, causing them to effectively "evaporate." Who better to show you that they know more about physics than Stephen Hawking than Stephen Hawking himself, yeas? Hell, even I understand the workings of black holes and I'm just some college kid.

DAMN...can't argue with logic, that's for sure! +1 Hmmm...whadya know, it's running right now and I'm still here.

My my Phee, you look very incorrect today.

Go to Japan!

So very incorrect...

Today in my computer class I learned that when regarding binary, there's only 10 kinds of people in this world...

I want my boyfriend to get out of his English class so we can go home, and I want it NOW!

Like my 6pm class got cancelled so no having to give a public speech about the results of drunk driving for me!!! If you're wondering what the punchline is...drinking 24 shots at CC on a snowy Saturday night results in a wrecked Hyundai...learn from my mistake

Skinny Puppy - Tear or Beat

Like some CRAZY ass martian bird thing with a red head and white spots all over keeps coming and picking off my crops... NOT in this yard...no way

What the fuck is wrong with all of you? WRONG!

Oh they are... But damn, I don't care, I <3 And One And you get +One

Trying to figure out why the fuck I'm still awake...